CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
Nguyễn Thị Kim Hương
1. Need for a Conceptual Framework
Why do we need a conceptual framework? First, to be useful, rule-making should build on and relate to an established body of concepts. A soundly developed conceptual framework thus enables the IASB to issue more useful and consistent pronouncements over time, and a coherent set of standards should result. Indeed, without the guidance provided by a soundly developed framework, standard-setting ends up being based on individual concepts developed by each member of the standard-setting body. The following observation by a former standard-setter highlights the problem.
2. Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information
Fundamental Quality—Relevance
Relevance is one of the two fundamental qualities that make accounting information useful for decision-making. Relevance and related ingredients of this fundamental quality are shown below.
To be relevant, accounting information must be capable of making a difference in a decision. Information with no bearing on a decision is irrelevant. Financial information is capable of making a difference when it has predictive value, confirmatory value, or both. Financial information has predictive value if it has value as an input to predictive processes used by investors to form their own expectations about the future. For example, if potential investors are interested in purchasing ordinary shares in Nippon (JPN), they may analyze its current resources and claims to those resources, its dividend payments, and its past income performance to predict the amount, timing, and uncertainty of Nippon's future cash flows.
Relevant information also helps users confirm or correct prior expectations; it has confirmatory value. For example, when Nippon issues its year-end financial statements, it confirms or changes past (or present) expectations based on previous evaluations. It follows that predictive value and confirmatory value are interrelated. For example, information about the current level and structure of Nippon's assets and liabilities helps users predict its ability to take advantage of opportunities and to react to adverse situations. The same information helps to confirm or correct users' past predictions about that ability. Materiality is a company-specific aspect of relevance. Information is material if omitting it or misstating it could influence decisions that users make on the basis of the reported financial information. An individual company determines whether information is material because both the nature and/or magnitude of the item(s) to which the information relates must be considered in the context of an individual company's financial report. Information is immaterial, and therefore irrelevant, if it would have no impact on a decision-maker. In short, it must make a difference or a company need not disclose it.
Assessing materiality is one of the more challenging aspects of accounting because it requires evaluating both the relative size and importance of an item. However, it is difficult to provide firm guidelines in judging when a given item is or is not material. Materiality varies both with relative amount and with relative importance
Fundamental Quality—Faithful Representation
Faithful representation is the second fundamental quality that makes accounting information useful for decision-making. Faithful representation and related ingredients of this fundamental quality are shown as follows.
Faithful representation means that the numbers and descriptions match what really existed or happened. Faithful representation is a necessity because most users have neither the time nor the expertise to evaluate the factual content of the information. million when it had sales of €79,644 million, then the statement fails to faithfully represent the proper sales amount. To be a faithful representation, information must be complete, neutral, and free of material error.
Completeness.
Completeness means that all the information that is necessary for faithful representation is provided. An omission can cause information to be false or misleading and thus not be helpful to the users of financial reports. For example, when Société Générale (FRA) fails to provide information needed to assess the value of its subprime loan receivables (toxic assets), the information is not complete and therefore not a faithful representation of their values.
Neutrality.
Neutrality means that a company cannot select information to favor one set of interested parties over another. Providing neutral or unbiased information must be the overriding consideration. For example, in the notes to financial statements, tobacco companies such as British American Tobacco (GBR) should not suppress information about the numerous lawsuits that have been filed because of tobaccorelated health concerns—even though such disclosure is damaging to the company.
Neutrality in rule-making has come under increasing attack. Some argue that the IASB should not issue pronouncements that cause undesirable economic effects on an industry or company. We disagree. Accounting rules (and the standard-setting process) must be free from bias, or we will no longer have credible financial statements. Without credible financial statements, individuals will no longer use this information. An analogy demonstrates the point: Many individuals bet on boxing matches because such contests are assumed not to be fixed. But nobody bets on wrestling matches. Why? Because the public assumes that wrestling matches are rigged. If financial information is biased or rigged, the public will lose confidence and no longer use it.
Free from Error.
An information item that is free from error will be a more accurate (faithful) representation of a financial item. For example, if UBS (CHE) misstates its loan losses, its financial statements are misleading and not a faithful representation of its financial results. However, faithful representation does not imply total freedom from error. This is because most financial reporting measures involve estimates of various types that incorporate management's judgment. For example, management must estimate the amount of uncollectible accounts to determine bad debt expense. And determination of depreciation expense requires estimation of useful lives of plant and equipment, as well as the residual value of the assets.
3. Enhancing Qualities
Enhancing qualitative characteristics are complementary to the fundamental qualitative characteristics. These characteristics distinguish more-useful information from less-useful information. Enhancing characteristics, shown in the following diagram, are comparability, verifiability, timeliness, and understandability.
Comparability.
Information that is measured and reported in a similar manner for different companies is considered comparable. Comparability enables users to identify the real similarities and differences in economic events between companies
Verifiability
Verifiability occurs when independent measurers, using the same methods, obtain similar results
Timeliness.
Timeliness means having information available to decision-makers before it loses its capacity to influence decisions. Having relevant information available sooner can enhance its capacity to influence decisions, and a lack of timeliness can rob information of its usefulness.
Understandability.
Decision-makers vary widely in the types of decisions they make, how they make decisions, the information they already possess or can obtain from other sources, and their ability to process the information. For information to be useful, there must be a connection (linkage) between these users and the decisions they make. This link, understandability, is the quality of information that lets reasonably informed users see its significance. Understandability is enhanced when information is classified, characterized, and presented clearly and concisely
» Tin mới nhất:
» Các tin khác: